Adios to Wells Trade

January 15th, 2010

As I was reviewing some old notes I had of  Wells Trade, the investment arm of Wells Fargo, I see a trend that Wells Fargo has been trying hard to make some money out of these “free-trade” accounts:

  • 02/2008 : Introduced 100 free trades for PMA package with $25k or more.
  • 08/2008 : Eliminated the respectable money market sweep funds and replaced them with a crappy bank account sweep.
  • 12/2008 : Eliminated RMMXX, a relatively high yield MMF at that time, for purchase.
  • 01/2009 : Close out fee increased from $50 to $75.
  • 03/2010 : Close out fee to increase to $95.

In addition, Wells Fargo has been “cracking down” on people who did not actively use the checking account of the PMA package. These accounts are marked as “dormant” and quite a few people reported having to jump through some hoops to re-activate them again.

With the talk of additional tax on big banks, I won’t be surprised to see another round of fee increase on the horizon. The money for the taxes has to come from somewhere.

Wells Trade did have some good points. Their reps are quite friendly and helpful, and the trading system, while nothing fancy, generally works. They also introduce a good online feature, which is the capability to track and specify specific tax lots for trading, very helpful for a taxable account.

Anyway, because of my upcoming Roth conversion, I am done with Wells Trade. I will be contributing $75 to them for the free trades they have given me over the past three years or so when I close out my accounts later this month. Good luck to all those sticking with Wells Trade.

Stumble it!

Reverting back to using checks instead of ACH

November 16th, 2009

ACH transfers (or better know as electronic funds transfer) is supposed to be the new method of money transfer in the 21-st century. But strangely enough, I find that I am reverting back to using checks for some of my transactions instead of using ACH. The following are some examples.

Depositing money at brokerages

TD Ameritrade offers a very fast ACH system for funds transfers. Recently, after setting up two new links to my bank accounts, I used the system to move some money from one account to another. That however seemed to trip them up and their compliance department sent me a secure message telling me not to use their ACH system to transfer money. In addition, they pointed out that, at their discretion, money pulled in using their ACH system can be held for up to 60 days before I can withdraw it.

Funds deposited electronically may be withdrawn three (3) business days after settlement date. However, all electronic deposits are subject to review and may be restricted for 60 days.

If I sent them a check, the funds can be withdrawn in six business days; there are no further restrictions after six business days. If I use ACH, there could be restrictions for up to 60 days.

Transferring money

My current paycheck goes into the Fidelity mySmartCash account. I had setup the mySmartCash account a few years ago for its very good BillPay system and availability of market rate money market funds. But now that the market rate for money market funds is very low compared to online savings accounts, I have been pulling out any excess money and moving them to the savings account (I am using Alliant Credit Union’s savings account) whenever my paycheck is credited. (I know I know, I should update my direct deposit instructions…).

To transfer the money, I do not use Fidelity’s ACH system. Instead, I write a check against the mySmartCash account and deposit into one of Alliant CU’s network of ATMs. The result: I start earning interest on the day of deposit (say Thursday). The mySmartCash account is debited only on the following Monday.

Similarly, when I have money to transfer out from TD Ameritrade, I write a check against that account and deposit it into the Alliant’s network of ATMs. I no longer use TD Ameritrade’s ACH system.

Paying for taxes

To pay for state and federal taxes, I used checks instead of ACH. This gives me additional float of the funds before the debit.

Conclusion

On surface the ACH system is a very efficient means of money transfer, however because of its relatively lack of security for the bank “pulling” the money, many financial institutions have chosen to impose limits on these transactions. Some of the liability issues are discussed in the following post on BankDeals:

If a bank initiates an ACH credit to another bank, that ACH credit cannot be recalled. So if a bad guy somehow got into a Provident account and transferred all the money out, Provident would be liable to the account holder (assuming it was a consumer — not a business — account) and it would have no easy way to get the money back from the bank to which it was sent.

On the other hand, if another bank initiates an ACH debit from a Provident account, then NACHA rules allow Provident to reverse the transaction — no questions asked — for 60 days if they can produce a Written Statement Under Penalty of Perjury (WSUPP) from the account holder. They are under no obligation to investigate the legitimacy of the WSUPP.

Stumble it!

Portfolio Return for October 2009

November 6th, 2009

2009-11-05_Portfolio Return 2009-10

2009-11-05_Asset Allocation 2009-10

Comments: Portfolio was on track to gain for the fourth month in a row until the last week of October. In the end, the portfolio had a small loss of 1.66%. Took the opportunity to rebalance out of US LargeCaps and PME into US SmallCaps, US Timber/REITS  and International EAFE equities.

Stumble it!